I've been saying in other blog posts that humans are created in God's image (Genesis 1:26-27) and are communicative and relational.
But we can also observe communication and relationship in some, if not
all, animal species. The Genesis account makes it clear that
animals are not created in God's image. So what is the difference
between the kind of communication and relationships that humans and
animals have? What is it about human communication and relationships
that is special and particularly reflects our status as God's
image-bearers?
I think it's love. When I think about what we see as relationships
between animals, they are really utilitarian, rather than characterised
by love. Animals enter into relationships with other animals mainly for procreation (only for very few is this an exclusive relationship) and for cooperation related to food sourcing etc. But the procreating kind of relationship is driven by hormones and instinct rather
than love. While hormones and instincts are also involved in human relationships, humans are also able to override their hormones and instincts when necessary for the sake of another person. As far as I know, animals do not have the option of
exercising self-control for the sake of another. As far as I know, they
do not make choices which sacrifice their own desires for the sake of
another, to put the other first. To do that would seem to go against the 'survival of the fittest' principle.
Humans' ability to have loving relationships that display conscious,
deliberate self-sacrifice seems to me to be a direct reflection of God's
relational character. God's deep love is supremely demonstrated in the way God the Father
sent his only Son to die as a sacrifice for the sake of those he loved (see John 3:16 and 1 John 4:9-10),
and the way God the Son willingly sacrificed himself for the glory and
honour of his Father, because he loved his Father and wanted to obey
him (see Luke 22:41-42).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment